Thursday, 16 September 2010
Thursday, 6 May 2010
Monday, 3 May 2010
Evaluation: Part 6: How did you attract/address your audience?
During our feedback we asked the rest of our peers what they thought went well in our film, what didn’t go so well and what could have been done in order to improve the project overall. It was broken down so that each member of the class had a chance to watch the movie up to 3 times and make notes on what aspects of the movie they wanted to discuss with us. We then asked them 8 simple questions, and as a class they answered us one by one, like a debate. Overall, we feel that we reached out to our target audience really well. This was because we had some very positive feedback from the audience. They easily understood the narrative of the movie as well as having an easy understanding of the codes and conventions. Before beginning to film, we considered what in specific we needed to use in order to appeal to the right target audience. During the feedback, when asking what sub-genre our movie was, most of the class had figured out that it was a ‘supernatural/psychological’ thriller. In terms of downfalls, we also had many negative comments. We were told that during our production, ‘when the girl throws the bear, she throws it on the floor next to her and then in the next shot, the bear was in the middle of the room.’ Also, the music at points was extremely unclear and was not always clear. Overall, I feel that we reached the right and correct target audience whom we wished to appeal to. I also believe that we used the right codes and conventions which at the end of our movie, reflected well on the audience’s opinions. We could improve in terms of making our movie flow further and also making the sound effects less fuzzy however overall we reached the right target audience.
Saturday, 1 May 2010
Friday, 30 April 2010
Thursday, 29 April 2010
Evaluation: Part 2: Who would be the audience for your product?
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
Evaluation: Part 1: Brief
This was part of our original movie which was based on vampires however in terms of our genre; we didn’t feel that it looked very thriller like.

Friday, 23 April 2010
Thursday, 22 April 2010
Thursday, 18 March 2010
Tuesday, 16 March 2010
Monday, 8 March 2010
Sunday, 7 March 2010
Saturday, 6 March 2010
Production: Friday the 14th- First film
This was our original film however looking back on the this first draft, we decided it wasn't as thrilling as we expected it to be so we changed our narrative and created a different movie which we then titled 'Possessed' and used that as a final piece.
Friday, 5 March 2010
Thursday, 4 March 2010
Thursday, 25 February 2010
Monday, 22 February 2010
Sunday, 21 February 2010
Thursday, 4 February 2010
Friday, 29 January 2010
Friday, 22 January 2010
Pre-production: Thriller Logo..
Pre-production: Logo..
Tuesday, 19 January 2010
Pre-production: Ideas for names of my thriller..
Monday, 18 January 2010
Pre-production: Music..
Pre-production: Research Ideas..
Freddie Cruger is a character played by Robert Englund in the collection of the American thriller films 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' from 1984. They were all written and directed by Wes Craven. The character of Freddie Cruger is usually based around a high school but can be based in other places. His character stalks, rapes and kills teenage children and adults in the harshest most slashest way possible. His character is known for his right hand which works as a weapon with 5 fingers replaced by 5 knifes. His skin is burnt and he is damaged, wearing a torn black and red stripy jumper and a black pair of trousers and black leather shoes. In my opinion, he is a character who can be used for my thriller as I feel that is character does the job of what a villian is supposed to do and he does this succesfully!
Sunday, 17 January 2010
Saturday, 16 January 2010
Friday, 15 January 2010
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Monday, 11 January 2010
Sunday, 10 January 2010
Pre-production: Mommin's Thriller evaluation..
.The antagonist in this film started off as a protagonist because he was an innocent man and for no reasons what so ever his family was murdered.
.He became an antagonist as he took the law in his own hand and started murdered the people that were involved in the case of his wife and daughter being murdered such as the judge. The reason for this was because the man that murdered the antagonist family got away lightly.
.The antagonist in this film as I described started off as a protagonist because of his family being murdered and from there you could see that he was very emotional and sad and you felt sorry for him but you still felt sorry for him when he turned into an antagonist.
.The antagonist in the film is very clever and witty which is reason the he got away with the murdered he committed for a long time. The antagonist is an engineer and a great thinker which is reason why he got away and done the murdered that he did even though he was in jail where he wanted to be.
.The antagonist role in this film is not a typical as you feel sorry when he was a protagonist but also when he turned into an antagonist because of revenge as you slightly understand why he did what he did.
Protagonist
.The protagonist in this film is the police who was the main responsible for the handling of the murder case for the antagonist.
.The protagonist in this film is also clever and witty as the antagonist as he boasts a 96% conviction but he was most of the one step behind the antagonist in the film.
.The protagonist role in this film is also not typical as you wouldn’t feel sorry for him because he could have done a lot more for the man that murdered the antagonist family but he didn’t want to damage his near perfect record.
Conventions:
.There is a lot of close-ups in the film to show the characters reaction of the events that have taken place.
.There is a number of conventions such as red hearing when the police are trying to catch the antagonist but have mislead because they think someone is helping the antagonist from the outside.
. Also there are a lot of twists in this film such as the judge being murdered when a phone blows when she takes her call.
. Also another convention that is used in this film is
.Another convention that is used in the film is hinting at things to come and the camerawork is the main code that is used for this such when the police were common for the antagonist.
Saturday, 9 January 2010
Wednesday, 6 January 2010
Monday, 4 January 2010
Pre-production: Phone booth..
Regular job and lifestyle
Sunday, 3 January 2010
Pre-production: Evaluations..
2- not all shots were well emphasised or used
3- most things were within shot when needed
3- many shots
4- dark colour palette, matched genre
2- not the right use of transitions
4- music relevent to genre
4- names, makers, films title, etc
Deadline:
3- steady when needed
1- not much in the shot
2- not many shots
1- colour palette didn't go well
2- limited editing
2- mininal use of transitions
1- no suspense built
2- names all came up two times each
Withheld:
4- very good variety of movement
3- most things were within shot
2- not a variety of shots
3- good use of lighting and colour palette, and good use of props
3- good variety of editing
3- transitions appropriate to the genre
2- not much music but use of wind sounds, creating atmosphere to a cerain extent
3- relevant and clear, noticeable







